Objective |
This case study looks at the behavior of a circuit board process through the use of control charts. At least two control charts will need to be constructed, and from them you will be asked to provide an assessment of what you see. A template to facilitate the construction of the control charts has been provided in Doc Sharing. You are not required to use this template, however, it will greatly facilitate the solution.
Problem Statement
Fujiyama Electronics, Inc. has had difficulties with circuit boards purchased from an outside supplier. Unacceptable variability occurs between two drilled holes that are supposed to be 5 cm apart on the circuit boards. Thirty samples of four boards each were taken from shipments from the supplier as shown in the data from the worksheet below. Data in the worksheet below can also be accessed in Doc Sharing in a file named Fujiyama Electronics Sample Data.
Fujiyama Electronics |
||||||
Observations |
||||||
Sample |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
1 |
4.92 |
4.26 |
4.94 |
4.29 |
||
2 |
4.65 |
5.54 |
5 |
5.42 |
||
3 |
5.77 |
5.26 |
4.76 |
4.79 |
||
4 |
6.25 |
4.88 |
5.66 |
4.44 |
||
5 |
5.27 |
5.41 |
6.02 |
4.91 |
||
6 |
5.22 |
5.38 |
5.08 |
4.65 |
||
7 |
5.47 |
4.68 |
4.56 |
4.7 |
||
8 |
5.71 |
4.54 |
4.17 |
4.87 |
||
9 |
5.24 |
5.58 |
4.72 |
5.41 |
||
10 |
4.42 |
5.18 |
4.79 |
4.73 |
||
11 |
5.14 |
4.26 |
4.71 |
5.48 |
||
12 |
4.92 |
5.78 |
5.5 |
5.05 |
||
13 |
5.79 |
3.83 |
4.3 |
4.78 |
||
14 |
4.92 |
4.8 |
4.75 |
5.59 |
||
15 |
5.68 |
5.74 |
4.65 |
5.2 |
||
16 |
5.43 |
4.81 |
5.27 |
4.96 |
||
17 |
4.79 |
6.04 |
4.47 |
5.18 |
||
18 |
4.43 |
5.08 |
3.69 |
6.43 |
||
19 |
6.35 |
5.95 |
6.29 |
5.89 |
||
20 |
5.03 |
4.66 |
5.25 |
4.46 |
||
21 |
6.32 |
6.09 |
5.57 |
5.91 |
||
22 |
4.3 |
5.47 |
4.27 |
4.34 |
||
23 |
6.07 |
4.97 |
5.51 |
5.02 |
||
24 |
5.11 |
4.9 |
5.91 |
4.66 |
||
25 |
4.5 |
5.24 |
4.86 |
4.35 |
||
26 |
4.91 |
4.79 |
5.74 |
5.03 |
||
27 |
4.65 |
4.71 |
4.81 |
5.32 |
||
28 |
4.7 |
5.5 |
6.04 |
4.3 |
||
29 |
5.87 |
5.3 |
5.78 |
5.07 |
||
30 |
4.41 |
4.75 |
4.95 |
5.11 |
||
Guidelines |
The student will submit the completed case study in a Word document to the Dropboxby the end of class Week 7. The paper is worth 50 points.
The student will complete and/or answer the following questions:
The format of the case study should conform to the Publication Manual for the American Psychological Association (APA), 6th edition, for the title page and text. Citations and references are not required. A basic APA tutorial can be found in the Webliography, and a paper template can be found in Doc Sharing. The completed case study will be submitted to your Dropbox as an MS Word document. All graphics and charts will be a part of the Word document and submitted as a file. Documents authored in other applications such as WordPerfect or MS Works will not be accepted.
This project is to be accomplished individually, and it will reflect the work of each student. All DeVry University policies are in effect, including the plagiarism policy. Late papers will not be accepted without prior permission.
Submit your Fujiyama Case Study paper to the Dropbox located on the silver tab at the top of this page by the end of Week 7. For instructions on how to use the Dropbox, read theseStep-by-Step Instructionsor watch thisDropbox Tutorial.
See Syllabus “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” for due date information.
Grading Rubrics |
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
First Control Chart |
20 |
40% |
Description |
5 |
|
All calculations are correct. |
|
|
5 |
|
X-Bar & R charts are presented and correct. |
|
10 |
|
All conditions of importance are discussed. |
Second Control Chart |
20 |
40% |
Description |
5 |
|
All calculations are correct. |
|
|
5 |
|
X-Bar & R charts are presented and correct. |
|
10 |
|
Differences between the two sets of control charts are thoroughly discussed. |
Mechanics |
10 |
20% |
Description |
|
2 |
|
The paper, including the title page, follows APA guidelines for format. (References and citations are not required.) |
|
2 |
|
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. |
|
2 |
|
The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and white space. |
|
2 |
|
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. |
|
2 |
|
Spelling is correct. |
Total |
50 |
100% |
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
Best Practices |
The following are the best practices in preparing this paper. Sample papers, using the APA format, are located in Doc Sharing. Other useful information has also been provided there, including an APA paper template.
Additional hints on preparing the best possible project:
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more